The topics range from networking, communication, supervisory issues, presenting, publishing and, of course, doing research.
How to survive your PhD
Showing posts with label reviewers. Show all posts
Showing posts with label reviewers. Show all posts
Thursday, 27 August 2015
14 Graduate student essays on the PhD experience
This is a great book (35 pages) that is a must-read for postgraduate researchers. With personal accounts that are intended to give advice that has been learned the hard way, it is essential reading for less experienced research students.
The topics range from networking, communication, supervisory issues, presenting, publishing and, of course, doing research.
How to survive your PhD
The topics range from networking, communication, supervisory issues, presenting, publishing and, of course, doing research.
How to survive your PhD
Tuesday, 7 January 2014
Guide to Peer Review
Click Here: Guide to Peer Review in Ecology and Evolution
The British Ecological Society has produced a guide for those wishing to learn more about peer review. Although intended for ecology researchers, it is relevant to researchers across a much wider variety of disciplines.
"This booklet is intended as a guide for early career researchers, who have little or no experience of reviewing journal articles but are interested in learning more about what is involved. It provides a succinct overview of the many aspects of reviewing, from hands-on practical advice about the actual review process to explaining less tangible aspects, such as reviewer ethics."
The British Ecological Society has produced a guide for those wishing to learn more about peer review. Although intended for ecology researchers, it is relevant to researchers across a much wider variety of disciplines.
"This booklet is intended as a guide for early career researchers, who have little or no experience of reviewing journal articles but are interested in learning more about what is involved. It provides a succinct overview of the many aspects of reviewing, from hands-on practical advice about the actual review process to explaining less tangible aspects, such as reviewer ethics."
Tuesday, 2 July 2013
Dealing with reviewers' comments on submitted manuscripts
Addressing reviewers' comments is a milestone in the publication process. This post follows from a recent training event at which we discussed the role of reviewers in journal publishing with PhD students who had not yet published their research in a journal. Here, I introduce the role of reviewers in the publishing process, and share some of the lessons from the questions posed by PhD students about how to address the comments from journal reviewers.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)